|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 10:32 am
|
|
|
|
Crazy eyes for life I have a question about D&D Next. While I haven't played it, nor have any in my usual group, what I have been told is that its become extremely streamlined, with a focus on pandering to new players, stat focus, and much less customization. How much of this is accurate?
Probably accurate from people who don't care for Next.
Quote: One of the things I enjoyed about 3.5 was that you could create just about any character you wanted by scouring enough books, and finding the right feats and what not.
Next streamlined that process.
Quote: Are the customization problems and pandering due to the game still being created and having a small information base, or because the system is built for the COD generation?
There were limited customization options for 4th edition as well at its inception. Its really only because its new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 1:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|