|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:27 pm
On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 werdofilms I'm not a gay if thats what your thinking.And if they love eachother cant they get married? When they are married its a loving bond for life, even if they cant have sex. A valid question. The Bible says to go forth and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Homosexual couples cannot reproduce. I know they can adopt but that is an entire issue on its own. Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24).
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:46 am
1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 werdofilms I'm not a gay if thats what your thinking.And if they love eachother cant they get married? When they are married its a loving bond for life, even if they cant have sex. A valid question. The Bible says to go forth and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Homosexual couples cannot reproduce. I know they can adopt but that is an entire issue on its own. Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24). No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:14 am
On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 werdofilms I'm not a gay if thats what your thinking.And if they love eachother cant they get married? When they are married its a loving bond for life, even if they cant have sex. A valid question. The Bible says to go forth and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Homosexual couples cannot reproduce. I know they can adopt but that is an entire issue on its own. Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24). No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:24 am
1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 werdofilms I'm not a gay if thats what your thinking.And if they love eachother cant they get married? When they are married its a loving bond for life, even if they cant have sex. A valid question. The Bible says to go forth and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Homosexual couples cannot reproduce. I know they can adopt but that is an entire issue on its own. Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24). No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day. Well honestly I don't think He got married. Plus I'd think the Bible wouldn't leave that out considering how the gospels included a lot about Jesus' life. Lots of things were prophesied about Jesus, and then the NT starts off with great detail in Jesus' life. A wife wasn't included and there isn't really any proof He had one. Plus, again He didn't "multiply." So He still wouldn't have followed the command in Genesis. And recall, He is perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:39 am
On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24). No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day. Well honestly I don't think He got married. Plus I'd think the Bible wouldn't leave that out considering how the gospels included a lot about Jesus' life. Lots of things were prophesied about Jesus, and then the NT starts off with great detail in Jesus' life. A wife wasn't included and there isn't really any proof He had one. Plus, again He didn't "multiply." So He still wouldn't have followed the command in Genesis. And recall, He is perfect. Ok. So here is the next question: Why would God want us to have the rule to multiply if he himself did not? I still think it is possible that Jesus had a wife, although maybe it is not a probable theory to me. But as you said, there is no way to prove it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:06 pm
1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST Good argument that the Pastor of my 2nd church from grace used at school chapter. But be very careful with this argument. It's a command for people to go for and multiply, correct? Did Jesus get married and have children when He walked the earth? What about Paul? That's why I didn't use that argument in my website. The verse can be used as a viable argument I suppose, but it can be countered by others and cause extreme controversy. Try the verses I used on the website that I posted on this page somewhere. Is it possible that they were just not mentioned? When the Bible was written, women were not seen as important as men. There could also be other reasons they were not married. One reason could be that Jesus was already perfect, so there was no need to to bring two halves together to make one whole (Genisis 2:24). No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day. Well honestly I don't think He got married. Plus I'd think the Bible wouldn't leave that out considering how the gospels included a lot about Jesus' life. Lots of things were prophesied about Jesus, and then the NT starts off with great detail in Jesus' life. A wife wasn't included and there isn't really any proof He had one. Plus, again He didn't "multiply." So He still wouldn't have followed the command in Genesis. And recall, He is perfect. Ok. So here is the next question: Why would God want us to have the rule to multiply if he himself did not? I still think it is possible that Jesus had a wife, although maybe it is not a probable theory to me. But as you said, there is no way to prove it. Well we were made in His image...maybe He wanted His beauty to be spread across the face of the earth. Possible...I guess that's a wait 'till Heaven or revelation mystery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 3:06 pm
On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day. Well honestly I don't think He got married. Plus I'd think the Bible wouldn't leave that out considering how the gospels included a lot about Jesus' life. Lots of things were prophesied about Jesus, and then the NT starts off with great detail in Jesus' life. A wife wasn't included and there isn't really any proof He had one. Plus, again He didn't "multiply." So He still wouldn't have followed the command in Genesis. And recall, He is perfect. Ok. So here is the next question: Why would God want us to have the rule to multiply if he himself did not? I still think it is possible that Jesus had a wife, although maybe it is not a probable theory to me. But as you said, there is no way to prove it. Well we were made in His image...maybe He wanted His beauty to be spread across the face of the earth. Possible...I guess that's a wait 'till Heaven or revelation mystery. lol yeah I have a laundry list of things I wand to ask God when I get to Heaven and that is one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 3:15 pm
1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST 1 Corinthians 13 On_Fire_4_CHRIST No, I don't think so. What you said about Jesus could be true, but I doubt it. I think that it's because He was just focused on His main goal - His reason for coming to earth. Given: women weren't as important. But they probably would have said something, and some woman did come up in the Bible. I know Paul definitely didn't get married. If you read I Corinthians 7, you'd know. Paul was not a hypocrite, and he didn't marry so that he could devote his time entirely to spreading the gospel. I wasn't really talking about Paul as much as I was talking about Jesus. Many people believe that marry Madeline was Jesus' wife. What are your thoughts on that? There is no real concrete proof to be found in the Bible. Keep in mind I am not talking about sexual relations, just the act of being married. There were a few women to be mentioned/ written about in the Bible, but that was still radical back in the day. Well honestly I don't think He got married. Plus I'd think the Bible wouldn't leave that out considering how the gospels included a lot about Jesus' life. Lots of things were prophesied about Jesus, and then the NT starts off with great detail in Jesus' life. A wife wasn't included and there isn't really any proof He had one. Plus, again He didn't "multiply." So He still wouldn't have followed the command in Genesis. And recall, He is perfect. Ok. So here is the next question: Why would God want us to have the rule to multiply if he himself did not? I still think it is possible that Jesus had a wife, although maybe it is not a probable theory to me. But as you said, there is no way to prove it. Well we were made in His image...maybe He wanted His beauty to be spread across the face of the earth. Possible...I guess that's a wait 'till Heaven or revelation mystery. lol yeah I have a laundry list of things I wand to ask God when I get to Heaven and that is one of them. Laundry...hold up, I have to put my clothes in the dryer! Thanks for reminding me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:16 pm
I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust.
The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra?
I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong.
Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:35 pm
eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:17 pm
1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply. It's funny that you talk about how an animal's purpose is to mulitply. A lot of people like to argue on this point, but I've realized something over the years that make their arguments invalid. Everyone likes sex, this much is true. But why? Why are people so drawn to sex? Because of our natural instinct to reproduce, of course. That's why sex is appealing, because sex is the act of reproducing. Thus, if two animals are doing "the deed" and not reproducing, then it must not be correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:50 pm
eramthgin a ni remaerd 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply. It's funny that you talk about how an animal's purpose is to mulitply. A lot of people like to argue on this point, but I've realized something over the years that make their arguments invalid. Everyone likes sex, this much is true. But why? Why are people so drawn to sex? Because of our natural instinct to reproduce, of course. That's why sex is appealing, because sex is the act of reproducing. Thus, if two animals are doing "the deed" and not reproducing, then it must not be correct. Exactly :3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:05 pm
1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply. It's funny that you talk about how an animal's purpose is to mulitply. A lot of people like to argue on this point, but I've realized something over the years that make their arguments invalid. Everyone likes sex, this much is true. But why? Why are people so drawn to sex? Because of our natural instinct to reproduce, of course. That's why sex is appealing, because sex is the act of reproducing. Thus, if two animals are doing "the deed" and not reproducing, then it must not be correct. Exactly :3 Also to mention the reason animals do it is a show of domination. It's a psychological reason animals do it. It's not of love. Nor is homosexuality of love it can not exist in homosexuality because love is not of the flesh. If they truly loved each other they would not need sex. Just as I love you guys and I love everyone. Doesn't mean I want to have sex with you and be with you for my life. Yes I love men that doesn't make me a homosexual because I would not want to have sex and be with them as a partner. Their so called "Love" is not LOVE. This is why YHWH can not stand them. They taint and twist LOVE which is what He is YHWH is love it is His gift. Then they try and make us have to accept them because they supposedly have love. They start corrupting love and begin corrupting society. Every empire that has fallen has accepted homosexuality as a normal thing.(It's usually the last straw for the empire) History repeats itself for a reason yet no one bothers to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:40 am
Yahshala 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply. It's funny that you talk about how an animal's purpose is to mulitply. A lot of people like to argue on this point, but I've realized something over the years that make their arguments invalid. Everyone likes sex, this much is true. But why? Why are people so drawn to sex? Because of our natural instinct to reproduce, of course. That's why sex is appealing, because sex is the act of reproducing. Thus, if two animals are doing "the deed" and not reproducing, then it must not be correct. Exactly :3 Also to mention the reason animals do it is a show of domination. It's a psychological reason animals do it. It's not of love. Nor is homosexuality of love it can not exist in homosexuality because love is not of the flesh. If they truly loved each other they would not need sex. Just as I love you guys and I love everyone. Doesn't mean I want to have sex with you and be with you for my life. Yes I love men that doesn't make me a homosexual because I would not want to have sex and be with them as a partner. Their so called "Love" is not LOVE. This is why YHWH can not stand them. They taint and twist LOVE which is what He is YHWH is love it is His gift. Then they try and make us have to accept them because they supposedly have love. They start corrupting love and begin corrupting society. Every empire that has fallen has accepted homosexuality as a normal thing.(It's usually the last straw for the empire) History repeats itself for a reason yet no one bothers to learn. -.- I am angry at you for this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:07 am
Furia Mistress Yahshala 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd 1 Corinthians 13 eramthgin a ni remaerd I personally think Homosexuality is wrong because my view of the matter is that they are bonded by pure lust. The church isn't just what says it is wrong. Remember Sodom & Gomorra? I also believe the typical "It was Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve" argument. If you can't reproduce with the same sex, I think it's obviously wrong. Kinda like mules, or ligers, or zonkeys (horse+donkey / lion+tiger / zebra+donkey). They are created by man, and do not exist in nature, therefore they are unable to reproduce. This is probably one of the best arguments you could make against Homosexuality. It is plain logic. People argue with me all the time that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah isn't about homosexuality, but when you read it, it's pretty darn obvious. I have an aunt that argues that homosexuality is natural because it happens in the wild. All I can say to that is that it doesn't happen in droves like it does for humanity, so there is obviously a social aspect to "being gay". I also like to point out that those animals die without fulfilling the purpose they were pursuing, which was to multiply. It's funny that you talk about how an animal's purpose is to mulitply. A lot of people like to argue on this point, but I've realized something over the years that make their arguments invalid. Everyone likes sex, this much is true. But why? Why are people so drawn to sex? Because of our natural instinct to reproduce, of course. That's why sex is appealing, because sex is the act of reproducing. Thus, if two animals are doing "the deed" and not reproducing, then it must not be correct. Exactly :3 Also to mention the reason animals do it is a show of domination. It's a psychological reason animals do it. It's not of love. Nor is homosexuality of love it can not exist in homosexuality because love is not of the flesh. If they truly loved each other they would not need sex. Just as I love you guys and I love everyone. Doesn't mean I want to have sex with you and be with you for my life. Yes I love men that doesn't make me a homosexual because I would not want to have sex and be with them as a partner. Their so called "Love" is not LOVE. This is why YHWH can not stand them. They taint and twist LOVE which is what He is YHWH is love it is His gift. Then they try and make us have to accept them because they supposedly have love. They start corrupting love and begin corrupting society. Every empire that has fallen has accepted homosexuality as a normal thing.(It's usually the last straw for the empire) History repeats itself for a reason yet no one bothers to learn. -.- I am angry at you for this. Angry or not, he is right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
