|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:01 pm
good news!
TO provide originality int he battlefield, i have edited some parts of it!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:06 pm
Archer_Jack good news! TO provide originality int he battlefield, i have edited some parts of it! Well... damn O_o eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:21 pm
yep and i put in some aircraft just to add some originality ( how the fsck are you going to have an NPC with IOWA battleships, Not be with at the very least, copters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:22 pm
Archer_Jack yep and i put in some aircraft just to add some originality ( how the fsck are you going to have an NPC with IOWA battleships, Not be with at the very least, copters. Haha, cause their an island based group! blaugh Also They can't cross that line, because our aircraft carrier battlegroups will blow them up...? ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:31 pm
Suicidesoldier#1 Archer_Jack yep and i put in some aircraft just to add some originality ( how the fsck are you going to have an NPC with IOWA battleships, Not be with at the very least, copters. Haha, cause their an island based group! blaugh Also They can't cross that line, because our aircraft carrier battlegroups will blow them up...? ninja because thats the contigent of our forces, and what three boats are behind us? cause they best be destroyers and a cruiser...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:50 pm
Archer_Jack Suicidesoldier#1 Archer_Jack yep and i put in some aircraft just to add some originality ( how the fsck are you going to have an NPC with IOWA battleships, Not be with at the very least, copters. Haha, cause their an island based group! blaugh Also They can't cross that line, because our aircraft carrier battlegroups will blow them up...? ninja because thats the contigent of our forces, and what three boats are behind us? cause they best be destroyers and a cruiser... pretty much yeah whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:18 pm
cause weve got subs, what the hecka re we gonna do in terms of anti sub?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:33 pm
Archer_Jack cause weve got subs, what the hecka re we gonna do in terms of anti sub? We might not need to. Unless the subs advance upon your position, you won't have to worry about them. You don't have to kill everyone; you just have to kill the base. blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:20 pm
Oh... well... we're going to have kind of a problem then. Torpedo Bombers? Ground units to disable the anti-air, and naval to hold back the obvious invasion of boats. Then we do air strikes, and air drops straight into the enemy bases. They're clustered so, yeah. Pretty easy. Just if you can coordinate it... everyone will have to be briefed. By the way... I'm the enemy. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:28 pm
Suicidesoldier#1 Oh... well... we're going to have kind of a problem then. Torpedo Bombers? Ground units to disable the anti-air, and naval to hold back the obvious invasion of boats. Then we do air strikes, and air drops straight into the enemy bases. They're clustered so, yeah. Pretty easy. Just if you can coordinate it... everyone will have to be briefed. By the way... I'm the enemy. whee I might be able to do that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:50 pm
Well then, considering were at sea, most of the aircraft will have to either be either carrier based, or Flown in from a distance away with Constant tanker refueling. I can also get some Aircraft with tomahawk cruise missles out and about to take out the radar systems of Anti-air units about the island. From there, we can bomblet bomb the installations to call em moot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical Physicist Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:35 pm
Archer_Jack Well then, considering were at sea, most of the aircraft will have to either be either carrier based, or Flown in from a distance away with Constant tanker refueling. I can also get some Aircraft with tomahawk cruise missles out and about to take out the radar systems of Anti-air units about the island. From there, we can bomblet bomb the installations to call em moot. Yes. It is. It incorporates everyone though right? Maybe a tad unorthodox for aircraft carriers to hold AIRFORCE units, but it makes it more linear. After all, other countries leave their planes on the U.S. aircraft carriers all the time so it's not that big of a deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:47 pm
actually it is a big deal, CATOBAR aircraft ( F-14Ds and F/A-18F) can land on carriers, due to an arresting hook which conventional aircraft(F-16C and F-15E) lack. Also, Carrier Based aircraft have special requirements, such as stronger landing gear due to the forces of landing on a carrier. Yet, AC aircraft also have one little thing, They are Catapult launched into the air, And conventional aircraft, they specifically need a runway to launch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:53 pm
Archer_Jack actually it is a big deal, CATOBAR aircraft ( F-14Ds and F/A-18F) can land on carriers, due to an arresting hook which conventional aircraft(F-16C and F-15E) lack. Also, Carrier Based aircraft have special requirements, such as stronger landing gear due to the forces of landing on a carrier. Yet, AC aircraft also have one little thing, They are Catapult launched into the air, And conventional aircraft, they specifically need a runway to launch. That's not a big deal. Hooks can be added to any fighter airplane from the F-15 to the present. All fighter planes incorporate this method so that they may land with ease. Bombers, cargo, electric warfare, not so easy. Also helicopters don't require the hooks. Israel only has access to roughly 70-80 F-16's. They use our Aircraft carriers all the time. They have some of the best trained pilots in the world as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
