Welcome to Gaia! ::

I prefer guys who are circumsized

At least if I'm gonna have anything to do with his p***s

Circumsized men still have skin that's movable. It's not like it's stretched so tight that it doesn't budge.



First, there's no PROVEN fact that says that circed guys get less sensation. That's merely myth and hearsay.

While I'm pro circ (to an extent, I chose it, but I don't condemn people who don't) I'm CON infant ear piercing (to an extreme), and I don't think they should be compared ever.
While ear piercing is purely, PURELY cosmetic, a circumcision is not. There's medical reasons people do it as well, from reducing the risk of HIV, to reducing the chance of UTIs, which can be family problems, to even religious beliefs.
Also, circumsision is ALWAYS done by a trained doctor in a sterile enviroment with a local anethestic, where as people take their babies to CLAIRE'S and trust some 19 year old girl with 5 minutes training, poor equipment and horrible information on the aftercare to piece their child. Big difference, HUGE, and therefore, NOT comparable.

But as this is about circ, I'll refrain from my usual continued infant ear piercing rant. wink

I read through this entire thread and I have a few things to mention and, hopefully, to shatter some misconceptions.

As the precentage of children who aren't being circumcised is increasing (Mainly since the 1960's), there is lots of misinformation being spread. Some things are simply lack of any experiance in the department, like some women (and some men!) who think that uncirc. Penises are shaped like torpedos, without a head. Others, such as personal hygine, are more skethy, and I will attempt to give an unbiased and informative viewpoint on it.

So here we go.

Personal hygiene with a uncircumcised p***s is easier than keeping the hair on your head clean. You only need to run some water over it when the foreskin is down and maybe rub it a little with a finger. You don't need to use soap (in fact I don't recommend it, because it usually stays down there, and is probably contradictive of the point in why you are using it in the first place.) You don't need to use a loofah or a washcloth, as that would hurt like ******** and damage the p***s. You don't need to do it every day, either.

On the uncircumcised p***s, the foreskin can be drawn fully back (and usually stays) during erection. It can also be pulled up and all the way over the head of the p***s, but it doesn't stay that way. In addition to there being the head of the p***s, there are also some folds of skin on there that would help with pleasuring a woman during sex. The fact that the skin can be moved on the p***s during erection eliminates lots of the need for extra lube during sex too. The natural stuff is often enough.

When not erect there are generally two types of uncircumcised penises, apperance-wise: Ones where the foreskin completely covers the head of the p***s, and folds up a little at the end, and ones where it only partially covers the head. Personally, I find the former ascetically displeasing, but the latter is fine with me. That's just my personal opinion, though.

If you choose to circumcise your kid or not, they will probably not mind either way. Personally, I'd wait until my child was old enough to decide for themselves, and then if they wanted the operation done, I'd let them have it. After all, if you get it cut early, they'll never experience life with an uncircumcised p***s, but if you let choose, they could experience both.

And that reminds me of a person anticdote. A friend of mine got an infection in his foreskin when he was 15 from not washing it for 3 months straight. He didn't tell anyone about it until it was bad, and they had to perform an emergency circumcision. He says, as a person who experienced both being circumcised and uncircumcised, that he much preferred his foreskin, and wished he had kept better care of it. He said that after he got his foreskin cut off, always having the head of he p***s out in the open was very painful, but eventually he lost some feeling in it, which allowed him to live with it more comfortably. However, you must take that with a grain of salt, because he may just be opposed to having a personal part of his body changed against his will, when he had already gotten used to having it there.

A few other things:

Uncircumcised men don't have more trouble getting erections, and if they DO, it's certainly not because of the small amount of extra skin on the p***s, as the foreskin itself doesn't fill with blood like the rest of the p***s, nor become erect. It would be like saying that people with big ears had more fickle erections.

Just because there are nerves cut off when you are circumcised, doesn't mean they are important. The male who possesses a foreskin feels no pleasure in the foreskin itself. I would know. I am one.

My opinion is this: Whatever you do, your kid isn't going to like or hate his p***s because of his possession or lack of a foreskin. Women who will dislike you because your foreskin's status probably (In my opinion) shouldn't be going out with you in the first place. Teach your children basic hygiene, when they're young, and infections SHOULDN'T be a problem. It only took one sentence out of my dad when he taught me how to take a shower.

As for being more likely to contract STDs? All I have to say is the man who relies on not having a foreskin to protect him for AIDS, Herpes, or any other STD, is going to soon become a man who HAS AIDs, Herpes, or some other STD. I imagine that people took a statistic that showed that men who were uncircumcised generally had more STDs than men who were, and slanted it to mean that being uncircumcised was a bad thing. I don't think that because I am opposed to circumcision, just beacuse I can't imagine a labratory making that a controlled experement.

As someone who really doesn't want to be in such a particular situation: I'm glad I'm circumcised, but wish I wasn't when overseas. That way... You know, I can claim to be not Jewish because of my foreskin.

Nothing against Jews, but I don't want to be beaten/maimed/killed because someone thinks I am and I can't prove otherwise.

I've been with both, and I personally prefer penises that haven't been circumcised. So, if I have a son, he'll be keeping his foreskin.

Mmm
I am semi circumssized I think
Cause I don't have OMIGAWD ton of skin but I have a little backed up behind the head, I think O.o. I have no idea if I'm describing it correctly. BUt yeah, so all those guys who think they can jack off without lube, so can I

when you gots a forskin the head of de p***s is WAY more sensitive vs not. im not saying that the forskin is some magical plesure enhance but it pertects the head vs not having one were it rubs up against your dipeys and whitey tightys which make it less sensitive or else circumcized people would have a hard time wearing pants
so people please leave d forskin
plus jewish people have all been atupid seince ad 60 jesus was the masiha you idiots god would not make you wait over like 3000 yrs

There's this magical new product out nowadays, really cheap.
It's called spit.
You may have heard of it.