|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:46 pm
Such an odd party, as is.
And, there's already a Ranger.
Hmm, what to make for a melee class.
Might just make a Ranger, anyways. Been really wanting to play a Beastmaster. If not a Beastmaster, either a dual-wielding ranger, a Barbarian, an Avenger or a Blackguard.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:56 pm
*only knows 2 of those classes.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:04 pm
Leaning towards Barbarian, at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:08 pm
woot woot, melee striker ftw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:02 am
Woot!
Ironically, seeing as how the Ranger is AC, you could easily go a non melee guy against reflex, but yeah, I was thinking a melee striker would make a nice addition. blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:13 am
The option for a melee striker is moreso aimed at providing another meat shield to the party. After some thought, I decided to throw in a 2-handed Straladin. He should be complete tonight after work, if not before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:21 am
Melee strikers pwn.
They are like, mah favorite. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:49 pm
I like how they are all mobile and stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:35 pm
Go ahead and take the slot. Work is killing me and getting my sheet finished has been an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:05 pm
Virulent Lover Go ahead and take the slot. Work is killing me and getting my sheet finished has been an issue. Snuff it, muff! rock that sixth ranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:07 am
Arc Vembris Virulent Lover Go ahead and take the slot. Work is killing me and getting my sheet finished has been an issue. Snuff it, muff! rock that sixth ranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:45 am
we dont need any defenders?
If not I'll roll a DPS
I might go ranger XD
I'll roll a fighter
for defense.....
I'm pretty ill today, so i'll get to work on my sheet tomorow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:34 am
We got a warden, so no, we don't need a defender.
You can roll whatever you want though, a melee DPS or guy against reflex would complete the group- so, a rouge in this case- but this group has like, two mages, so IMO it doesn't really matter.
You can be whatever you like. xd
A striker is needed, any kind, basically, mostly due to the two controllers, but you could potentially be anything. xd
The book actually recommends two tanks in a big group, actually any group above 4, even 5+, so if you really wanted to go fighter it's not completely unwarranted either. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:01 pm
a DPS defender like a two-handers fighter or a str paladin would be ideal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
