|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:47 am
But Knigtmare Frames are a lot more powerful, it just depends on your position and rank....the higher you are, the better your Knightmare is....so you can give the Troops the Burai's while higher ranking officers get the Akatsuki's....then only the top people who are in charge can get the Lancelots or Guren Mk II's
xD
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:10 pm
yeah but then someones going to throw flak at how unrealistic it is... >_> and zombies are realistic? if someone devs a T-virus yeah... but still...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:37 pm
These Mechs, Gundams, and Knightmares actually arnt all that fake. The military created new technology everyday...things you couldnt even imagine....and if the military was brave enough to "show" and small mech suit that can lift objects...im most likey sure that they've created something similar to what i've said earlier....
Zombies are indeed realistic because im most likely sure that the government created something to bring the dead back to life....lets just hope the have the anti-virus as well....we'll see what happens on 2012 right? blaugh I'll just be sure to create a group like S.T.A.R.S. 3nodding xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:35 pm
The zombies are not realistic.
It's merely a simulation scenario- I could make a roleplay about walruses zombie vampires; and besides, it's going to be done with capsules filled with paint (Simunitions).
But the mech's, even if they are capable of being created, are far too ineffective, far too inefficient, and far too stupid. Why the hell are we going to create a robot with a HEAD, when it doesn't need a head- why the hell are we going to create a super killing machine WITH ******** HANDS AND LEGS when integrated automatic guns and WHEELS or tracks do a much better job?
Besides, if we WERE to make a mech with legs, it would have multiple legs, say 4-8, so instead of max being able to run 28 mph (like a human...) instead it could sustain 70-80 mph (like a cheetah...). If we were to make a legged animal, we'd base it off of the animals that run the best; which would be cheetas, various forms of steers, and random insects.
The idea is ridiculous in it's own right- we, as humans, are one of the few creatures to walk on two legs on a regular basis, and it's considered to be a "A controlled fall". As well, we as humans lack dangerous appendages, such as stingers, or spikes, or SHARP TEETH AND CLAWS like every other ******** animal seems to have. We, compared to other monkeys (even chimpanzees) are the weakest, and way weaker compared to our weight to strength ratios. We aren't fast, we aren't strong, and we sure as hell don't have any good defensive abilities (we literally have to teach each other ways to use our hands in combat!). We have such weak assets, that we literally have to create things that conform to our weird structure; guns are not the best design ever, we remove efficiency for ergonomics so we can actually USE them. Swords, knives, guns, everything has to have loads of extra design features for humans to be able to use them, and then we need a ridiculous amount of training to do so. Why, would you ever design a robot shape after a human?
It's a solution for a non-existent problem. The only benefits it can provide can be better met with planes and helicopters already in existence- oh, but you don't like helicopters, let's replace with an impossible mech! xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:00 pm
lol,you think too much....waaaaay too much
1) a virus or anything dealing with something such as that is capable of bring dead tissue back to life....the military has experimented more than you could think of...so its more realistic than ever...even if its a simulation HERE on gaia,then sure,i understand but i ment real life.
2) Mechs are a lot more effective, efficient, and more suffisticated than you realize....it may not need a head,i grant you that point....BUT, giving this machine hands will enable it to hold and grabs things...not just for war but for various other reasons....as for the legs, if you look into the Knightmare frames i was talking about before, you'll see wheels attached to the back which would give a higher spped rate than a mech with multiple legs......so in reality,2 legs has a higher spped and agility rate than a mech with 4 - 8....remember,these are mechs we're talkin about here....large,heavy weighed,human piloted machines...
3) Its not based off the animal itself, only the method of which makes it the best or what gives its advantages over the others.
4) A good point about humans but realize what you say is faulty about the human shaped mechs.....rethink your answer.....Mechs weigh in tons while humans weigh in hundreds....humans dont have metalic steel platted armor while the Mechs do.....Humans can stand up straight while pther animals cant which means we have an advantage for the height...and the way we design the human shaped mech could increase the speed and velocity rather than any other design....
So sure Humans suck if it comes to survival or anything else but to relate that to a machine cannot be compared because they can be built larger in size and can also have its energy increased by 10 fold....you understand the point im driving at here?
The problem is very well exists my friend, although its not fully built and used but protypes have already been made...and so far,they will be used for construction purposes in Japan in about 3-5 years...this was said in a news article about a year and a half ago..... Planes...Helicopters...Tanks....those things are becoming useless and obsolete...while technology grows everyday......just as new gaming systems come and go throughout a year is an example of how things work in the military. xp ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:16 pm
lol, or you think way too little; the idea is awesome, but not plausible. It's pseudo science, not science, taking what you want from physics and tossing out the rest like it doesn't exist. As well, a mech with wheels is the same as a tank with wheels... wheels are obviously needed. It doesn't need a head or hands; it's only use for hands would be to pick things up, and it's primary job would be to SHOOT things, not to engage in melee combat (a sword or hand-to-hand combat, lol) So, the vehicle would have tank like cannons or heavy machine guns (or heavy automatic cannons). It's actually based off of humans, so Gundamns, can SWORD fight, but we don't need sword fighting mechs, so we would essentially be taking a sword fighter and remodeling it for something that uses guns, which would be, crazy. As the only advantage would be agility (legs are more agilic) which we could use specialized wheels for, although legs that could move sideways at command instantly wouldn't be too bad. Rather than a Mech, something like a Tri-Pod styled vehicle would be better and achieve the same effects- high off the ground, better maneuverability, and three legs instead of two. Although being higher off the ground is actually a defect, and a worse thing to have, becuase it makes you an easier target (especially for things on the ground), and be a lot easier at falling over, with you only needing to take out the legs to knock it down and disable it, which would undoubtedly be skinny little things. To put simply, analyze one of the best predators on the planet, that's survived for nearly 400 million years and has a very efficient design. Alligatorsz.It's legs are short and low to the ground, and yet very powerful. Becuase it's body manages most of the "Jump Forward"; much like how small tires are and how big engines are and how engines are inside the body of a car. Which is currently the most efficient design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:57 pm
who said they needed to fight with swords? Gundam has the Notoriety of giving swords to Mechs, owever, in the battletech, and Macross series, Almost all mechs have no sword or knife whatsoever. Only Missiles, energy weapons(lasers for one case), and a Ballistic weapon of some sort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:01 pm
Archer_Jack who said they needed to fight with swords? Gundam has the Notoriety of giving swords to Mechs, owever, in the battletech, and Macross series, Almost all mechs have no sword or knife whatsoever. Only Missiles, energy weapons(lasers for one case), and a Ballistic weapon of some sort. Yes, but their designed to fight with swords, and scaled up infantry weapons. Which is... A little useless. And energy weapons? Aren't all weapons, technically, energy weapons, regardless of what you mean by that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:14 pm
Yes kinetic and other weapons, but energy as in lasers,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:22 pm
Archer_Jack Yes kinetic and other weapons, but energy as in lasers, The problem with your pitch is that... it's racist. And technically impossible... so... How do you expect we respond to both the impossibility, extreme expense it theoretically would cost, and the fact that it's racist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:33 pm
Oh my. eek
You mean you don't know why it's racist?
...and you don't seem to not see why this couldn't work?
Herm.
Very interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:35 pm
This is my weapon   Its my favorite sniper of all...the Intervention
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:45 pm
lol...
You've watched future weapons one too many times huh? xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:49 pm
No this weapon already exists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
