|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:16 pm
^ has <>'s sympathy... he has a (spare) service sector job, too...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:17 pm
^Is a working stiff.
<> Needs gas for car...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:21 pm
<> needs some of that too...darn gas prices, stop going up!!! *yells at nothing in particular*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:25 pm
Well, considering that fossil fuels are a non-reproducing source of energy, it does make sense that, as supplies go down, prices will rise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:27 pm
Pondering on ^'s comments, <> wants a nice electric or hybrid car...
*sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:28 pm
^^that's where Ethanol comes in, we must use more and more of that, yup, now it's time for <> to skidaddle, see ya!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:29 pm
^Farewell.
Bah to ^^'s hybrid/electric car.
<>Wants a car that can run on salt. Or nuclear fission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:31 pm
<> agrees with ^... but sees none on the horizon; the other alternatives are closer at hand. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:39 pm
Well, we should either start finding ways to harness radiation as a form of energy, or deweaponize the nukes we DO have and use them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:43 pm
...Safely. I mean, do we really want the nuclear meltdown version of rusted-out Chevys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:45 pm
Well, it would certainly cause a lot less crash incidents, wouldn't it? I mean, who would go out driving drunk if they knew they had a nuclear device that would most definitely kill not only them, but their entire town?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:47 pm
lol FAAAAAAAAR too many, I'm afraid! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:48 pm
Bah, ^ has no faith in the self-preservation instinct of mankind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:59 pm
Naaah... <> has faith in mankind... just not necessarily *individuals*. He's seen, worked with, and driven around far too many of them. smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:02 pm
A person as an individual is usually smart and inventive. People as a group are stupid and unimaginative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
