|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:54 pm
22/22 Points to Use
8 +2= 10
10+0= 10
10+1=11
10+5=14
10+5=14
10+9=16
2+1+5+5+9=22
How's that?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:05 pm
I've had a change of heart. If no one else is playing a Wizard, I'll do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord of the Vine rolled 12 6-sided dice:
2, 5, 4, 1, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 1, 1, 6
Total: 38 (12-72)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:08 pm
Lets try that first half roll again.
2,5,4,1 = 10
4,3,4,4 = 12
3,1,1,6 = 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord of the Vine rolled 12 6-sided dice:
2, 5, 1, 6, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3
Total: 33 (12-72)
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:09 pm
Second half
2,5,1,6 = 13
2,2,2,3 = 8
2,4,1,3 = 9
...Yeah, I'm going to do the 22 point-buy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:10 pm
Jomjom, the Poisonous GnomeDetails and background pending. Ranged Striker, in case anyone's wondering. Sorcerers need more poison powers. EDIT @ 7:00 PM EST: Changed some stuff around. Now he uses a dagger instead of staff. Now a multiclass warlock, but only to get an encounter power with the poison keyword. I'll get back Defensive Mobility and Arcane Flexibility with my next two feats, most likely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:15 pm
Arcanist Angus Save me a spot! I'm thinking either a Bard with emphasis on History or a Wizard...with emphasis on history. Are you allowing the Supplements such as Arcane power? I'd like to try using the Tome implement for the Wizard if I may. I don't think she is. If I'm wrong, I may swap out some of my powers to make sure I have more poison attacks (or acid, failing that). But I wouldn't count on it, by the sound of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:16 pm
10
11
10
18
14
9
Result of the 22 point-buy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:23 pm
You guys full up, or do you want a Druid? (I'll have to make it, of course, but hey, that's half the fun of the game!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:27 pm
Rain Yupa Arcanist Angus Save me a spot! I'm thinking either a Bard with emphasis on History or a Wizard...with emphasis on history. Are you allowing the Supplements such as Arcane power? I'd like to try using the Tome implement for the Wizard if I may. I don't think she is. If I'm wrong, I may swap out some of my powers to make sure I have more poison attacks (or acid, failing that). But I wouldn't count on it, by the sound of it. Well, that's alright. Maybe I'll make a Bard then instead. Those are fun. But I will see what she says. BAH, I'll just make a damned bard. I can be a controlly/leader build. Half-Elf bard coming up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:32 pm
Michael Bladebreaker You guys full up, or do you want a Druid? (I'll have to make it, of course, but hey, that's half the fun of the game!) We have a Paladin, a Sorcerer, 2 wizards a wizard, a bard, and either a Cleric or Shaman. That's... an awful lot of ranged support sweatdrop Virulent, I would say a Cleric to better compliment the Paladin. Michael, I'll gladly step aside and let you play. I'm in enough games already, so you can have my spot. As VC, I'd much rather have newer blood in our games than veterans :3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:40 pm
Rain Yupa Michael Bladebreaker You guys full up, or do you want a Druid? (I'll have to make it, of course, but hey, that's half the fun of the game!) We have a Paladin, a Sorcerer, 2 wizards a wizard, a bard, and either a Cleric or Shaman. That's... an awful lot of ranged support sweatdrop Virulent, I would say a Cleric to better compliment the Paladin. Michael, I'll gladly step aside and let you play. I'm in enough games already, so you can have my spot. As VC, I'd much rather have newer blood in our games than veterans :3 Wait, wasn't someone making a rogue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:49 pm
Dion did on page 1, but on page 2, he said he had a change of heart, and wanted to play a wizard instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Bladebreaker rolled 12 6-sided dice:
4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 2
Total: 40 (12-72)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:52 pm
Ooh-rah. Let's do this. xD Also, if I make some minor mistakes, it's 'cause I'm used to 3.5.
First roll set!
9, 16, 15.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:54 pm
Arcanist Angus Rain Yupa Michael Bladebreaker You guys full up, or do you want a Druid? (I'll have to make it, of course, but hey, that's half the fun of the game!) We have a Paladin, a Sorcerer, 2 wizards a wizard, a bard, and either a Cleric or Shaman. That's... an awful lot of ranged support sweatdrop Virulent, I would say a Cleric to better compliment the Paladin. Michael, I'll gladly step aside and let you play. I'm in enough games already, so you can have my spot. As VC, I'd much rather have newer blood in our games than veterans :3 Wait, wasn't someone making a rogue? I was, but then decided against it. My love for the Wizard is eternal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
