|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:02 am
Are we starting at first level?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deadusernamelol rolled 8 6-sided dice:
5, 3, 5, 1, 4, 6, 6, 2
Total: 32 (8-48)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:08 am
First level is always enjoyable. I'm doing 4d6, and if we aren't, I'll just re-roll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deadusernamelol rolled 8 6-sided dice:
4, 6, 3, 3, 1, 6, 5, 3
Total: 31 (8-48)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mackie the Knife rolled 12 6-sided dice:
2, 1, 1, 6, 5, 6, 3, 3, 3, 6, 6, 5
Total: 47 (12-72)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:10 am
Sounds like a good idea
Roll 1: 2,1,1,6 = 9
Roll 2: 5,6,3,3 = 14
Roll 3: 3,6,6,5 = 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deadusernamelol rolled 8 6-sided dice:
3, 3, 4, 2, 5, 5, 5, 5
Total: 32 (8-48)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mackie the Knife rolled 12 6-sided dice:
3, 2, 3, 6, 5, 3, 3, 5, 5, 2, 5, 4
Total: 46 (12-72)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:12 am
Roll 4: 3,2,3,6 = 12
Roll 5: 5,3,3,5 = 13
Roll 6: 5,2,5,4 = 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mackie the Knife rolled 3 6-sided dice:
4, 2, 2
Total: 8 (3-18)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:15 am
And 1 for HP (4) and 2 for Starting Gold (40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deadusernamelol rolled 3 6-sided dice:
3, 5, 5
Total: 13 (3-18)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:38 am
Yeah, but I don't love my last roll. I don't have enough for my weapon and tools, let alone clothes.
I'm making a Half-Elf Thief with the Swashbuckler kit - a professional gambler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:15 am
I are doing max HP... and I guess since you guys already took the initiative, we'll do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KamikaziFreak rolled 12 6-sided dice:
4, 5, 2, 5, 6, 6, 6, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6
Total: 57 (12-72)
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:06 pm
Ok, I don't know anything about how the rest of this works, but I know how to roll me some stats!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KamikaziFreak rolled 12 6-sided dice:
1, 5, 3, 6, 6, 2, 4, 1, 2, 5, 3, 5
Total: 43 (12-72)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:08 pm
Again!
4, 5, 2, 5 = 14
6, 6, 6, 2 = 18
4, 5, 6, 6 = 17
1, 5, 3, 6 = 14
6, 2, 4, 1 = 12
2, 5, 3, 5 = 13
So...basically all good. Any ideas what I should make? I'd like something standard, but I don't even know what the core classes and races are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:51 pm
Well, the races are the same.
The classes are about the same as 3.5. Tell me what type of character you want, we'll see what is closest to it. You know, do you want to be more of a fighter, or a dual wielder, or a thief, or mage or a cleric... cause there's a lot of different kits that can be taken or you can use a normal base version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:02 pm
I do like some classes more than others, but there isn't a core class that I wouldn't want to play in 3/3.5. I'm willing to play anything, and if AD&D works in the "You need one of each of the four basic classes or you will not survive this dungeon" way, I'll take whatever fills the gaps.
I'll try to not be completely non-commital here. In 3rd, monks benefit from having 3 or more high stats a lot more than, say, a wizard. Is that the case in 2nd? I like monks. Alternately, a well-rounded wizarding type sounds fun, with a bit of practical magic, a bit of weapon capability, and a bit of blow-stuff-up. Third choice would be the good ol' sword-and-shield combo (or maybe axe-and-shield, as a dwarf?), nothing fancy.
We've got a thief already, what else are people playing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:06 pm
KamikaziFreak I do like some classes more than others, but there isn't a core class that I wouldn't want to play in 3/3.5. I'm willing to play anything, and if AD&D works in the "You need one of each of the four basic classes or you will not survive this dungeon" way, I'll take whatever fills the gaps. I'll try to not be completely non-commital here. In 3rd, monks benefit from having 3 or more high stats a lot more than, say, a wizard. Is that the case in 2nd? I like monks. Alternately, a well-rounded wizarding type sounds fun, with a bit of practical magic, a bit of weapon capability, and a bit of blow-stuff-up. Third choice would be the good ol' sword-and-shield combo (or maybe axe-and-shield, as a dwarf?), nothing fancy. We've got a thief already, what else are people playing? No monks: Raganui Minamoto Restricted: Oriental Adventures - their martial arts are just plain rape in non-Oriental Adventures. But with those stats you can be just about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
