|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:31 pm
|
|
|
|
Rain Yupa Current character ideas, I'd be willing to play: Thrown weapon Seeker (Controller) Casty Druid (Controller) Avenger of Love (Striker) Either the thunder or thane Barbarian (Striker) Bashy Rogue (Striker) Shooty Ranger that does NOT focus on Interrupts (Striker) Warden damage sponge (Defender) I was leaning away from Leader, since JD expressed interest in it, and if Bren ends up not playing or something. Or if Bren plays a leader. From what it looked like, the Cleric is Melee, the Paladin is melee, the Assassin is sort of melee, and the Wizard is sort of damage-dealy. So another ranged character wouldn't be bad. But I dunno how much damage output there is in melee, either. Hmm... I hate indecision gonk I would say I'd be leaning towards Seeker or Barbarian atm, though. the assassin is mostly melee, he has one or two ranged attacks, one of which pulls monsters into melee. the whole class is primarily melee focused, with a lot of maneuverability.
I haven't looked at the seeker too strongly, but one that focuses on the control elements would probably be a nice tag-team with arc's currently more blastery wizard, and an extra striker's always welcome if you prefer the barbarian. Though, that's just my take on the party. Also I find it a bit ironic that barbarian, seeker and paladin are all characters we've had that disappeared and at least two of them might be showing up again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:43 pm
|
|
|
|
I'm done my spunky teenage Seeker, save for the background. I mean, I figured with a Cleric, a Paladin, and either JD or Brin both having the likelihood of playing a leader, I'd be all set.
Not that I wouldn't mind playing one, since Leader is my preferred role, but it normally gets called so I'm content playing something else ^-^'
Yeah, I went and chose powers that were mostly controller-esque in nature, rather than the more damagey ones. She uses daggers, instead of heftier weapons like javelins, tridents, or tratnyrs. Why Seekers aren't naturally proficient with hand axes and/or throwing hammers is beyond me.
It's getting me a +8 to hit without an 18 in my primary, though. Yay!
Making dinner now, but I'm still hoping to hear back from Brin about what kind of character he wanted, since I'm still eager and willing to play a Barb or a Leader as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:39 pm
|
|
|
|
NayrVentess I would suggest someone being a leader, or taking the Paladin who has his/her lay on hands, since my cleric isn't exactly focused on healz, which Wrasynth found out the hard way sweatdrop I have my two healz per encounter obviosuly, but I haven't got any feats or items to help with healing, and my powers are based on attacking, since Ultio (my character) is a battle cleric. So yeah, a leader or at least someone else with healz would be good, coz I won't be able to heal a party of 6, nooooooooooo way.
If I end up not playing Jasmine, but instead the Barbarian, I'll probably make it a Half-Elf, and take Recovery Strike (DP,p31) as my Dilettante power. Or, if I end up with that tactical warlord I always wanted to play, even more healing than that 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|