|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:11 pm
There was no such thing as Global Warming before the Industrial Revolution, so obviously, it clears up that Global Warming is indeed man made. So those scientists that're saying that it's a 'natural cycle should be quiet and hide their faces in public. Second of all, everyone's actions have consequences. People should start taking responsibility for what they've done to the earth and start helping out. And third of all, polar bear populations are quite stable and supposedly increasing, so there really isn't much danger of them going extinct. However, that doesn't mean we should forget about conserving them and saving the Arctic and the Antarctic ice. I think the way to save our planet lies within the rain forests. If people actually enforced protection laws to save what remaining rain forest we have and to attempt at replanting the ruined ones for hope in the future that there would be more rain forests. If people actually did this, a hundred years later, our planet ought to be cleaner and greener and actually live.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:10 pm
Chayce West There was no such thing as Global Warming before the Industrial Revolution, so obviously, it clears up that Global Warming is indeed man made. So those scientists that're saying that it's a 'natural cycle should be quiet and hide their faces in public. Second of all, everyone's actions have consequences. People should start taking responsibility for what they've done to the earth and start helping out. And third of all, polar bear populations are quite stable and supposedly increasing, so there really isn't much danger of them going extinct. However, that doesn't mean we should forget about conserving them and saving the Arctic and the Antarctic ice. I think the way to save our planet lies within the rain forests. If people actually enforced protection laws to save what remaining rain forest we have and to attempt at replanting the ruined ones for hope in the future that there would be more rain forests. If people actually did this, a hundred years later, our planet ought to be cleaner and greener and actually live. In most of the cases of scientists saying global warming is a natural cycle, they are saying that there is a natural cycle of warming and cooling, in addition to man-made warming. Polar bear populations may be increasing / stable, but as the extent of sea ice decreases, the polar bears' hunting range also decreases. This will no doubt lead to a lot of hardship for polar bears. Whether they will be able to adapt and find new food sources is pivotal to the survival or demise of polar bears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:02 pm
All we did to the global warming cycle is speed it up because of all the pollution we send up in the air creating a stronger greenhouse effect. Thus speeding up global warming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:46 am
sixfourone you are right,we need more trees to lessen the pollution more trees will not 'lessen' the pollution enough to save our world it will merely give us oxygen to live longer when our world dies, they do breath carbon dioxide but one tree will not make a HUGE difference.we REALLY need to lessen the car traffic of the world, and the greenhouse gasses, made our modern ways
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:44 pm
Patsfball1 So wat if my grandkids dont see a polar bear i didnt see a dinosaur and u dont see my crying thats not the point, the point is you wont HAVE any grandkids if we keep going the way were going now, you statement was just irrelevant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
