|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 3:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:46 pm
I KNOW, RIGHT?! An undead bear… WITH UNDEAD BULL SHARKS FOR ARMS!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:54 am
I see RAW issues,
Rend (Ex): If a gristlygnash hits with both claw attacks, it latches onto the opponent’s body and tears the flesh.
Improved Grab (Ex): To use this ability, a gristlygnash must hit with a claw attack.
No Claw attack...
Attack: Bite +11 melee (1d8+9)
Full Attack: 2 bites +10 melee (1d8+9), +5 slam (1d8+4), and bite +5 melee (2d6+4)
So, ether dm ruling; changes the sharks back to a claw, or change the wording claw words to bite, OR two of it's impressive traits become useless.
Besides, still not impressed a single cleric of level could turn/rebuke it or someone flinging a few potions of cure light wound at the beast would slay it simple enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Cross Nemesis Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:09 am
Southern Cross Nemesis I see RAW issues, Rend (Ex): If a gristlygnash hits with both claw attacks, it latches onto the opponent’s body and tears the flesh. Improved Grab (Ex): To use this ability, a gristlygnash must hit with a claw attack. No Claw attack... Attack: Bite +11 melee (1d8+9) Full Attack: 2 bites +10 melee (1d8+9), +5 slam (1d8+4), and bite +5 melee (2d6+4) So, ether dm ruling; changes the sharks back to a claw, or change the wording claw words to bite, OR two of it's impressive traits become useless. Besides, still not impressed a single cleric of level could turn/rebuke it or someone flinging a few potions of cure light wound at the beast would slay it simple enough. Probably lifted directly off of a monster what has rend and improved grab; it's homebrew content so a lot of people probably know what he meant. As for the Cleric or Potion… WHO CARES, IT'S AN UNDEAD BEAR WITH UNDEAD BULLSHARKS FOR ARMS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:59 pm
Just saying, the definition of best is one of personal belief. Though it does have aire of coolness about it and does warrant a spot in a game(maybe a repeating one). But, to me this monster isn't impressive enough to get the label BEST. MONSTER. EVER...
On a side note, it does give me an idea for a game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Cross Nemesis Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 4:51 pm
The coolness is what makes it the best monster ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
