|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:27 pm
Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:55 pm
Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:30 pm
Gunslinger_Harrison Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. It's so small... >.>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:37 pm
Banned_Again_XD Gunslinger_Harrison Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. It's so small... >.> Big things come in small packages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:56 pm
mikekz Banned_Again_XD Gunslinger_Harrison Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. It's so small... >.> Big things come in small packages. That's not what I mean, I mean that they spent somewhere around a trillion dollars to make something the size of a big toenail. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:57 pm
Banned_Again_XD mikekz Banned_Again_XD Gunslinger_Harrison Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. It's so small... >.> Big things come in small packages. That's not what I mean, I mean that they spent somewhere around a trillion dollars to make something the size of a big toenail. sweatdrop I know. Ain't it great?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:50 am
that is a small processor. i want one. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:31 pm
Bag of Monster Banned_Again_XD mikekz Banned_Again_XD Gunslinger_Harrison Banned_Again_XD Didn't IBM help? It costed like a gajillion dollars to make so it should be really good. (64 bit, not bad) Yup, it was developed by IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. It's so small... >.> Big things come in small packages. That's not what I mean, I mean that they spent somewhere around a trillion dollars to make something the size of a big toenail. sweatdrop I know. Ain't it great? Yes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:52 am
It's hard to believe that something that small is a high performance cell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:58 pm
WhiteTaiku It's hard to believe that something that small is a high performance cell. That's... pretty much exactly what I've been saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:14 am
Random fact; the PS3 processing chip has more transisters (spelin of) in it than a PS2 a Xbox and a Game cubes transisters put together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:31 pm
Queen Litas b***h Random fact; the PS3 processing chip has more transisters (spelin of) in it than a PS2 a Xbox and a Game cubes transisters put together. Heh, I don't even know what a transiser DOES. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:48 am
Im not to sure how it works but a current runs thought the base and colecter and then it open up the Emitter which can then pass current, or somthing like that, it's like a round about for current.  Anyways the PS3 will have 300 milliion transistors, producing a theroretical max of 51 billion dot products per second, compared to the Xbox 360's 33.6 million dot products per second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Queen Litas b***h Im not to sure how it works but a current runs thought the base and colecter and then it open up the Emitter which can then pass current, or somthing like that, it's like a round about for current. Anyways the PS3 will have 300 milliion transistors, producing a theroretical max of 51 billion dot products per second, compared to the Xbox 360's 33.6 million dot products per second. Wow, that's a lot more... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
