Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

Register FaceBook Login Login

 

 
 

View User's Journal

Introspectives in the Key of Culture
I'll just be writing to write....
OH NO THE HELL HE DIDN'T!!
I'm a raging leftist, and a protestant. I'm not incredibly religious, but I am a CHRISTIAN.

Let it be known: Some Catholics are out of their head. I just watched the Colbert Report, and listened to this idiot spout bullshit til my head popped off and I had to bolt it back on. This man considers himself a leader, and an educated man. If he is, I'll watch the Passion of the Christ til my eyes bleed.

I watched this educated man tell me that Jesus was the founder of the Catholic church. This however isn't true, the founding of the Catholic church was most certainly created long after the death and resurrection of Christ, and considering it's reformation as the Roman Catholic church under the Nicean Convention, was most cerrtainly not founded by the JEWISH Christ. In fact Christianity wasn't created by Christ, it was founded on him, and based on his life, the actions he took, but not by him. Christ was a Jew. A Rabbinical Jew.

Why are we mentioning that Christ was a Rabbinical Jew. Well, this man had the audacity to call the Da Vinci Code a downer of a movie. Now this is most certainly an oppinion, and I cannot deny this categorically, however, much of what is stated in the Da Vinci Code is backed by Rabinical law. Mary would never have been allowed to touch Christ, lest she was married to him. Christ could also never have been a Rabbi without a wife. Christ was a Jew, and as such to have never sinned would have been forced to follow the laws of the jewish. Considering his lauding of the Passion of the Christ as the best movie out of Hollywood in the last 25 years, I'd like his head checked. The Passion was a joke. Continuously claimed as an authentic movie, the exaggerations, and the outright junk written into the movie, were totally without biblical foundation. A Raven did not bite the eye out of the third man on the cross. There was no devilish demonic baby mentioned in the bible.

A third thing which has pissed me the bloody ******** off:
This educated leader of Catholics claims that we, the left, though he qualified saying the secular left, feel guilty about things which we should not feel guilty about. To illustrate this he makes mention of the atrocities dealt to the Native Americans. Why does this bother me, I've heard it so many times before? His reasoning was that the actions of forefather's are not our own. Same rhetoric as used by many gaians, however he continues in this rhetoric claiming that Native Americans, are not Natives. Of course he would know having been born in these United States; Native Americans simply migrated several thousand yrs ago across the Bering Strait from Asia.

This man, is William Donahue, the President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights. This man is an idiot. A full blown idiot, I doubt he's ever read a bible in his life, for serious. The fact is that in the bible, the sins of the father are visited upon the sons. His hatred for the GLBT community is well noted and notorious. His study of both Catholic and Protestant history is obviously lacking. This man amuses me in that he believes he is Christian.

Caz_Nova
Caz_Nova
Prev | Next»
Archive | Home

  • Entries to 2
  • Entries to 1


  • User Comments: [3]
    Demon baby? The Bible sounds a lot like it was written by Bram Stroker than if it was written a thousand or so years ago...

    I should go read that version. Sounds like a good horror story. Snakes, the devil, ravens... I smell a Pultizer Prize.

    comment Coffy · Wed Jul 26, 2006 @ 06:24am
    Even satan can use Scriptures for his own benefit.

    comment Genyusai · Sat Feb 17, 2007 @ 07:53am
    I am like the only guy in the world who hasn't seen passion icon_sad.gif

    comment Joeseppi · Thu Oct 25, 2007 @ 06:38am
    User Comments: [3]