My Twilight Deck! (YGO) [update/changed]

[Jazzy Zeig]

Masqueraide

Jazzy Zeig

Masqueraide

I appreciate the comments and suggestions, but calling it a bad deck and inferring I don't know how to use it are a bit much ;P

When a general deck concept is commonly seen, and when we see a deck that follows said concept yet fails to perform at its desired output, it's going to be called bad. That's something you'll have to deal with, and think about.

Furthermore, we're not going to suggest cards dependent on what you currently have. It's a clear way of us saying "get more".

Have you tested my deck list? You can't assume the output is bad. :]

No, I'm pretty sure I can tell you that it is.

[[-Zera-]]

Asura Priest and Cyber Dragon are bad in Lightsworn because they don't do anything relevant for the deck; they're only in here because they are Light monsters and you think they make your deck original. Trust me, both cards were thought of and dismissed a long time ago. Being creative for the sake of being creative accomplishes nothing. I've got no problem with creativity, but there has to be a purpose. There is no purpose to your creativity, you're just doing it to do it, and it's making your deck bad.

Moving along, there's this little thing that happens when you are good at something (card games included): you can spot good and bad decks and/or players just by looking at them or talking to them. A basketball player can spot when someone else is good or bad at basketball. I don't need to play you to know your deck is bad. You also have some hint that the deck needs fixing, or you wouldn't have posted it for critiques to begin with.

It's got nothing to do with pride, I just know what I'm talking about. When I'm wrong, I'll definitely let you, though. Honestly, kids these days get so hung up on the delivery that they completely miss the message. =/

[Masqueraide]

[-Zera-]

Asura Priest and Cyber Dragon are bad in Lightsworn because they don't do anything relevant for the deck; they're only in here because they are Light monsters and you think they make your deck original. Trust me, both cards were thought of and dismissed a long time ago. Being creative for the sake of being creative accomplishes nothing. I've got no problem with creativity, but there has to be a purpose. There is no purpose to your creativity, you're just doing it to do it, and it's making your deck bad.

Moving along, there's this little thing that happens when you are good at something (card games included): you can spot good and bad decks and/or players just by looking at them or talking to them. A basketball player can spot when someone else is good or bad at basketball. I don't need to play you to know your deck is bad. You also have some hint that the deck needs fixing, or you wouldn't have posted it for critiques to begin with.

It's got nothing to do with pride, I just know what I'm talking about. When I'm wrong, I'll definitely let you, though. Honestly, kids these days get so hung up on the delivery that they completely miss the message. =/

I realize what you're saying. Like I said. I changed my deck up a bit again and put it at 41. Now then, I know exactly what you're talking about, and can tell when someone is good/bad just by a small conversation and sometimes just by looking. And I did come here because I was having a little trouble with it/it wasn't performing like I wanted it to. I didn't, however, ask for people to post what they thought of myself as a duelist.