Asphalt Lion
Offline
Post: 56458929_1 created on Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:05 pmPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:05 pm
![]() |
I really like patterns, and I really like the whole concept of relative minors. I don't know why, it just really intrigues me.
Futzing around, I came up with this: Hey, click me! So here's what I did: I put down an octave in half-steps starting with C and ending with B, and took the relative minor of each starting note, and then the relative minor of that, etc, until it circled around again (there's no point really in repeating it over and over again). So that's the first chart. Just for grins, I (starting again with C) went diagonally down until the pattern would cycle again. The neat thing is, I didn't make the half-step octave list for the second chart. It just so happened that the relative minor of the last note in this pattern was the starting note of the next line. What's really cool is that when I did the diagonally-down thing with this one, it made the first chart again. When I went diagonally up in the second chart, it just made a descending half-step octave. Going back to the original chart, I went diagonally up and made the third chart, the one at the bottom. Diagonally up on that one makes the circle of fifths (I don't know if the circle actually goes on as far as the list, but I know it starts out the same: CGDAE, etc). Diagonally down makes the first chart again. Now, I don't really know a whole lot about music theory, and I don't really know a whole lot about music history, so I don't know if I've stumbled upon something that matters at all, of if it's just nonsense. Either way, I think it's neat. Can anybody shed any light on this? |
|








