Welcome to Gaia! :: Communism | Forum

Register FaceBook Login Login

 

 
GST

Welcome to Gaia's forums, where millions of members gather to discuss random stuff, make new friends,
complain about life, argue about nothing, laugh at dumb pictures, discuss serious issues and/or curse like sailors.

Lurking is creepy. Quit skulking in the shadows and join the conversation!

Register to reply

Advertisement
[ Poll ] Communism

Do you think Obama would be a good leader of Communism?

Yes 0.23333333333333 23.3% [ 7 ]
No 0.56666666666667 56.7% [ 17 ]
I don't know 0.2 20.0% [ 6 ]
Total Votes: 30
Tags: communism  government  politics  ideals 
Share:  
forum:26, topic:56032307
< 1 2 3
Mr Pschyo
if we had comunisem where every one was paind equally eventually no one would be working because they would get paid either way

First of all, it's called communism. Learn to spell. Second, you're blatantly oversimplifying an entire fiscal ideology based on one of the lesser issues dealt with by the poorly organized Soviet Union. Your critique here, if one could even call it that, isn't so much an attack on communism as it is on the Soviet production model. Maybe you should read some capital before you open your mouth. Kthnxbai.
 
     
 
Communism is just boring for starters...
     
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
if we had comunisem where every one was paind equally eventually no one would be working because they would get paid either way

First of all, it's called communism. Learn to spell. Second, you're blatantly oversimplifying an entire fiscal ideology based on one of the lesser issues dealt with by the poorly organized Soviet Union. Your critique here, if one could even call it that, isn't so much an attack on communism as it is on the Soviet production model. Maybe you should read some capital before you open your mouth. Kthnxbai.

srry im not obsessed about communism douch bag and whoopde ******** do if i dont know how 2 speel it at least im not makeing my self look like a know it all douch bag -.-
 
     
 
Obama is a socialist. he is using a similar plan for healthcare that the Nazis did. Killing the overly sickly, handicapped, and those with mental problems. Nazi's called it "mercy deaths", Obama calls it "your duty to die". http://www.larouchepac.com
     
Mr Pschyo
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
if we had comunisem where every one was paind equally eventually no one would be working because they would get paid either way

First of all, it's called communism. Learn to spell. Second, you're blatantly oversimplifying an entire fiscal ideology based on one of the lesser issues dealt with by the poorly organized Soviet Union. Your critique here, if one could even call it that, isn't so much an attack on communism as it is on the Soviet production model. Maybe you should read some capital before you open your mouth. Kthnxbai.

srry im not obsessed about communism douch bag and whoopde ******** do if i dont know how 2 speel it at least im not makeing my self look like a know it all douch bag -.-

I don't think I'm doing that at all, I'm just being ******** coherent, like you SHOULD be.
 
     



Me and Jesus, Buddah, Moses, and Gouranga
All dance around, dancing on your thunder
Drunk on the wine of love for thee.
Well tell me when will I be blessed to join the bliss of your company.

<3 Adopted by Skittish Nature-Boy! <3
 
M. Angel
Stephells the Soviet
yeah is dead
Stephells the Soviet
yeah is dead
And why does America have the latest technology? Capitalism.

Exactly, Russia and China did Communism to early, but we are updated far beyond everyone in Military that's why we should switch to Communism. In WWII people in America were thinking of switching to Communism because they would all share the wealth and no one would have to bring in Barrels of money to buy necessary things such as food. If we switch we would all be equal, plus we would already be ready to defend against attacks. the U.S. is to aggressive anyway.
And eventually, America will no longer be leading in technology.

Not True, Russia had great Military Technology during the Cold War, they had better technology then us. But they spent to much time Producing and Maintaining these weapons, what I propose is to keep a Balance between the two, and since we are so far in technology we have a head start to just concentrate on the Economy. Just as long we don't spend to much time on either one we will do fine. Making everyone equal in our life would eliminate most of the depression in our country to.


You do know that they stole a crapload of technology from us right? Can anyone say nuclear?


They had way better spies than us. Thus, they legitimately acquired nuclear technology. They funded espionage more as it's a more versatile investment than R&D.

But still, they should've given R&D more funding than oppressing the moderately wealthy for the sake of lowly proles and corrupt oligarchs.
     
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
if we had comunisem where every one was paind equally eventually no one would be working because they would get paid either way

First of all, it's called communism. Learn to spell. Second, you're blatantly oversimplifying an entire fiscal ideology based on one of the lesser issues dealt with by the poorly organized Soviet Union. Your critique here, if one could even call it that, isn't so much an attack on communism as it is on the Soviet production model. Maybe you should read some capital before you open your mouth. Kthnxbai.

srry im not obsessed about communism douch bag and whoopde ******** do if i dont know how 2 speel it at least im not makeing my self look like a know it all douch bag -.-

I don't think I'm doing that at all, I'm just being ******** coherent, like you SHOULD be.

ok if thats wat u call it i guees but ur still acting like a douch
 
     
 
Mr Pschyo
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
Great_Xibalba
Mr Pschyo
if we had comunisem where every one was paind equally eventually no one would be working because they would get paid either way

First of all, it's called communism. Learn to spell. Second, you're blatantly oversimplifying an entire fiscal ideology based on one of the lesser issues dealt with by the poorly organized Soviet Union. Your critique here, if one could even call it that, isn't so much an attack on communism as it is on the Soviet production model. Maybe you should read some capital before you open your mouth. Kthnxbai.

srry im not obsessed about communism douch bag and whoopde ******** do if i dont know how 2 speel it at least im not makeing my self look like a know it all douch bag -.-

I don't think I'm doing that at all, I'm just being ******** coherent, like you SHOULD be.

ok if thats wat u call it i guees but ur still acting like a douch

He's being comically ironic and acting fascist about grammar and spelling.
     
YOU SAW MY SIGNATURE.

You now owe me 10 gold.


Christopher Columbine
who me o.o?
 
     
 
Stephells the Soviet
I personally think that Communism would help this broken Economy, because instead of individual wealth we all would share.
You are actually right. Now all you have to do is get it to work!
     
Have you ever been hungry?

People who have: 3
HAHAHAHA OH WOW.
 
     
http://i48.tinypic.com/281yccw.jpg

Und Zarathustra sprach also zum Volke:

Ich lehre euch den Übermenschen.
Der Mensch ist Etwas, das überwunden werden soll.
Was habt ihr gethan, ihn zu überwinden?
< 1 2 3

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

We will be phasing out support for your browser soon.

Please upgrade to one of these more modern browsers.